Reviews of the Ephemeral

Posts Tagged ‘Dai George’

‘Then Spree’ by Nia Davies

In Pamphlets on April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am

-Reviewed by Donald Gardner-

then-spree

Much of Then Spree, Nia Davies’s first pamphlet of poems, reads like a focussed, if somewhat wayward diary: ‘Look up. Berries suspended in thorns/ are that same rackety churlish: / an overspill of fluster, / my lurching, a leach of sagey green.’ This poem (‘Born in a moody basket’) closes with what seems like a statement of intent for her poetry: What next in my fidgety solstice? / Heart in the headland – observe the invisible wealth.’ The compactness of her work can feel like a kind of shorthand, sometimes rather too tied to personal references to be easy for a reader to follow. At the same time one’s sense that she is a poet with a strong idea of what she wants her poetry to do invites a closer reading.

Another piece, ‘An Autobiography of the Ophicleide’ is an account of a more-or-less obsolete wind instrument, but she makes a point about Darwinian survival in the last lines, ‘But my throb fell flat in the pond of other pipes, / their other useful selves ascending.’ Davies is attracted by the charm of many things that have ceased to be: is her tone one of mourning or celebration? I think the latter, as her work is mostly too upbeat to stay long in the mode of grief. I think of Hopkins’s line, ‘All things counter, original, spare, strange’, and I’d go further and say that there is something of Hopkins’s spirit in her poetry, as if the medium has in her eyes a protective function – to remind us of the validity and worth of non-go-getters in our materialist world. In ‘Barge in the Slug of Slow’, she again reminds us that ‘history’ is a two-speed process:

‘Extinction, they say, could be at first
near stagnant, submerged, like a barge

in a sewer canal that one day comes
unclogged, moving along to the rapid half of history.’

And in ‘The Gun’, a poem about a historic docklands pub of this name, she again takes issue with this two-speed history:

‘… history
is handcart driven, all the better for its bowels,
previous sorrows and suspect tales.

Across the way, the ever-advertising dome,
that project/folly: land kneed perfectly
in the ribsides to make folk live up

to nothing, from something. …’

These poems don’t always wear her experience lightly, but they do make a tantalizing code of their material, much of which is open to deciphering. Things shine through the lines, and I see a pursuit of ecstasy in her work, that again reminds me of Hopkins. As in ‘I want to do everything’:

‘Bibulous, happy, exploded in the litter
of pomegranate. I want to live long.’

I don’t mean to force a parallel, but Davies’s almost mystical combination of sheer delight and the application of a magnifying glass to out-of-the way detail in, say, a landscape or a city scene, gives her work a similar ethos to his. Also there is her experimental way with language, which is not gratuitous but, as I see it, mystically driven, in that she forces language to reveal things for which it is normally a veil.

I’m not sure which other poets might be ‘sources’ for Davies’s work, except herself. Dai George suggests in the blurb that she is influenced by experimental American work. This may be so, but I was more struck by how individual her voice is. I looked at the early months of her interesting blog, Sky like That, where she has some entries she calls ‘walking diaries’ – in Ethiopia, but also in Hackney and West Wales. They give a clue to her self-shaping as a poet, the compressed nature of her writing and her training as a poet by a close reading of the life around her, city or country. I’d write her up as a promising and seriously original poet who sometimes displays a madcap grace as in ‘Periphylla Periphylla’, which is about a man with a jellyfish heart travelling on the top of a London double-decker.

‘… visible through the greased glass
of the night bus. He travels

sunkenly and half-happy
through a dawdling soup,
the city’s deep midwater.’

It’s some trope, this poem – definitely spare and strange, even, I would say, irresistible.

Oxford Poetry XIV.2 (Winter 2012)

In Magazine on February 13, 2013 at 12:46 am

photo (19)

-Reviewed by Claire Trévien-

It’s a compliment to say that Oxford Poetry, one of the oldest poetry magazines of its kind (113 years old to be precise), does not look its age. The cover may be quietly unassuming, in a vintage picnic basket kind of way, but the list of contributors reads like a who’s who of the Next Big Thing (with some exceptions, such as Fiona Sampson who, we can agree, is no longer emerging). Just like a previous generation of poets centred around the workshops of Michael Donaghy, many of these are regulars at Roddy Lumsden’s Poetry School workshop.

This leads naturally to another compliment, that in spite of there being a sense that this grouping of poets are all part of the same ‘pack’, there is no uniformity of voice. No one could accuse Sophie Mayer and Matthew Hollis’ poems of being too similar in tone, form, or subject. Nevertheless, some themes do emerge, reflecting the tastes of editors Lavinia Singer and Aime Williams, for storytelling and still lives. Still lives here is meant as freeze-framing of a particular time, as epitomized by Daniel W.K. Lee’s ‘The Way we Wore Young’ whose snapshot of 1995 America erects cultural and time barriers, pelting information like a Windows screensaver from which a killer last line emerges. On the storytelling side, Emily Hasler’s poem ‘What Gretel Knows’ is a stand-out, a delightfully dark take on the Hansel and Gretel fairytale, set out in long barbed lines:

‘Gretel knows, put a girl in water and she’ll drown; boil it;
and she’ll cook. Gretel knows there’s no salvation; only storage,’

Each line powers forward scattering on the way clashing registers: part dark incantation, part childish glee, part sweary delicious humour. It’s an exhilarating trip, relying on our pre-knowledge of the tale to transform it into a larger meditation on these archetypal characters all ‘obsessed with our stomachs’.

Not all poems are exceptional, a number try to deal with historical or fictitious events but struggle to bring added interest to the table. For instance, Ben Parker and Alex Niven’s reports from unknown places feel insubstantial, though the latter has turns of phrase that add colour to the depictions: ‘Warriors were / expunged from the phonebook’ and ‘Friends withered and sank’, he writes. Parker’s ‘From the Histories I’ would have perhaps benefited from being partnered with his more intriguing poem ‘From the Histories II’ (also from his pamphlet, reviewed here by James Webster), which reveals the limitations of Oxford Poetry‘s current one poem format. As a standalone, however, there is little of interest in the language though the premise shows promise:

‘Conflicting reports were delivered daily
from the city of high walls and no gates.
The crops were flourishing even
as the wells came up dry.’

Also disappointing is Fiona Sampson’s ‘The Night-Drive’, a poem which doesn’t add anything to its title save for the blossom which hangs ‘hallucinatory / in darkness, beside the road’. Perhaps most frustrating with these poems is that there is no active ‘flaw’ within them, but they are unsatisfyingly straightforward descriptive poems lacking in intent or purpose.

Thankfully, there is no lack of exciting poetry elsewhere in this journal which more than makes up for this. Indeed, there are more standout poems than can fit in this review, such as Sophie Mayer’s intoxicating flight of fancy ‘The Mayer’, or Dai George’s ‘My Peace, the Ornament’, which begins with a delightfully playful description of the invasion of noise into his flat from ‘the witless bus and incontinent van /unloading on the kerb’ before ziplining the reader, along with the narrator ‘to days when childhood’s brain / was a rammed junction.’ Other favourites include a creative translation by Sophie Collins of Astrid Lampe, and Caleb Klaces’ ‘An Agreement’, whose elastic mixture of theatrics, birds and claustrophobia is set playfully on the page making the eyes leap from line to line.

Meanwhile Phillip Crymble shows what it means to take a risk; his poem ‘Brogue’ flirts with disaster with its bordering-on-cliché definitions. Taken individually its sentences feel frustratingly predictable, but they build up into an intriguing exploration of language and identity for today’s third culture kid:

‘All over. Meaning lost or gone. A local idiom that speaks
of disappointment. When asked it’s here I say I’m from.

All over. Meaning don’t belong. An orphan with no mother
tongue. The aspirated consonants of Ulster. Low-mouthed

vowel sounds. A confederacy of opposites.’

Where Crymble plays on simple expressions to create a complex tableau, John Canfield’s ‘Amortisation’ prefers to borrow from the ‘”Jargon Buster’ of a commercial property developer’ to create a humourously obscure take on a relationship:

‘Real trust exempts participants both
from growth and service. The exchange is total
return earned over a specific period
and often expressed at the beginning of the year.
Turnover. Yield.’

By turns conservative and experimental, modern and old-fashioned, this issue of Oxford Poetry is designed to please everyone, which won’t be to the taste of everyone, but who are we to point fingers at an institution for having democratic tastes?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,227 other followers